プライム無料体験をお試しいただけます
プライム無料体験で、この注文から無料配送特典をご利用いただけます。
非会員 | プライム会員 | |
---|---|---|
通常配送 | ¥410 - ¥450* | 無料 |
お急ぎ便 | ¥510 - ¥550 | |
お届け日時指定便 | ¥510 - ¥650 |
*Amazon.co.jp発送商品の注文額 ¥3,500以上は非会員も無料
無料体験はいつでもキャンセルできます。30日のプライム無料体験をぜひお試しください。
Swan Lake [Blu-ray]
形式: Blu-ray
¥3,800 ¥3,800 税込
{"desktop_buybox_group_1":[{"displayPrice":"¥3,800","priceAmount":3800.00,"currencySymbol":"¥","integerValue":"3,800","decimalSeparator":null,"fractionalValue":null,"symbolPosition":"left","hasSpace":false,"showFractionalPartIfEmpty":true,"offerListingId":"SuZTU9KqMbxnIEa6056FmXcWf6g9g8Raq2eQ6ETi40THvNHlafy8cOYK7%2Bc5r2gN94ZnielNiTo3snjWF27o%2FfVgH9DF0oShNaK2z1%2BTFeEc%2B1WnIf5gess9QkascXEcROeEccHrtPZfMtWAPvH6UD8G4go5LEvMz5CUZk4RnkPkvACfqOBcmA%3D%3D","locale":"ja-JP","buyingOptionType":"NEW","aapiBuyingOptionIndex":0}]}
購入オプションとあわせ買い
この商品をチェックした人はこんな商品もチェックしています
ページ 1 以下のうち 1 最初から観るページ 1 以下のうち 1
登録情報
- アスペクト比 : 1.78:1
- 言語 : 英語
- 製品サイズ : 1.78 x 19.05 x 13.72 cm; 90.72 g
- EAN : 0809478071747
- 製造元リファレンス : unknown
- メディア形式 : Blu-ray, クラシック
- 発売日 : 2015/6/30
- 言語 : 英語 (Dolby Digital 5.1)
- 販売元 : BBC / Opus Arte
- ASIN : B00WUKI0NW
- ディスク枚数 : 1
- Amazon 売れ筋ランキング: - 162,734位DVD (DVDの売れ筋ランキングを見る)
- - 52,033位ブルーレイ
- カスタマーレビュー:
-
トップレビュー
上位レビュー、対象国: 日本
レビューのフィルタリング中に問題が発生しました。後でもう一度試してください。
2020年5月2日に日本でレビュー済み
Amazonで購入
最初オシポワの筋肉質の脚と王子の表情に違和感を覚えましたが見返すごとに引き込まれていきました。黒鳥の舞は勿論、終盤、湖のほとりで王子と再会したオシポバの頬に一筋の涙が光っているのを目にしたのは私の錯覚でしょうか?感動です。悪魔も斬新で素晴らしい。
2018年1月3日に日本でレビュー済み
Amazonで購入
意外なことにオシポワの白鳥が映像化されるのは初めてです。
マシューゴールディングとの相性も素晴らしく、美しい白鳥でした。オシポワのSwanはアームが少し固いような気がして、これからもっと雄弁になっていくのだろうと思いながら鑑賞をしました。観る前までは、黒鳥の方が突出して良いと思っていました。確かに予想を上回る素晴らしさだったのですが、私は白鳥により惹かれました。儚さと強さが拮抗していて、己の存在自体を定義し切れていない苦しさを感じました。マシューもまさに王子であり、愚かさと純粋さが素晴らしかったです。
ただし、コールドはいつも通りそろっていません。それを差し引いてもロイヤルらしいクオリティの高さです。
マシューゴールディングとの相性も素晴らしく、美しい白鳥でした。オシポワのSwanはアームが少し固いような気がして、これからもっと雄弁になっていくのだろうと思いながら鑑賞をしました。観る前までは、黒鳥の方が突出して良いと思っていました。確かに予想を上回る素晴らしさだったのですが、私は白鳥により惹かれました。儚さと強さが拮抗していて、己の存在自体を定義し切れていない苦しさを感じました。マシューもまさに王子であり、愚かさと純粋さが素晴らしかったです。
ただし、コールドはいつも通りそろっていません。それを差し引いてもロイヤルらしいクオリティの高さです。
2019年6月23日に日本でレビュー済み
表情や表現力が豊かなので、白鳥の臆病でか弱い感じが伝わってきます。舞台セットが凝っていて、マイムや演出のおかげでコミカルで楽しい舞台でした。気に入って何度も見てしまいます。
他の国からのトップレビュー

MAPE
5つ星のうち5.0
Super
2024年1月9日にベルギーでレビュー済みAmazonで購入
Zeer tevreden over deze versie. Prachtige decors en uitmuntende dansers. Echt een aanrader!

Andrea C.
5つ星のうち5.0
Schwanensee -Ballett, ein Klassiker in einer exellenten Neuaufführung,
2020年2月23日にドイツでレビュー済みAmazonで購入
ja , ich habe diese Bluray erst jetzt entdeckt, ok die Produktion ist von 2015. Dennoch bezeichne ich diese Schwanensee Aufführung vom Royal Opera House als eine fein recherchiert, bis in das kleinste Detail Choreografie und Bühnenbild, wie es zu Zeiten am russischen Zarenhof gewesen sein muss. Da es ja Fotos oder Skizzen von damals gibt, hat sich das Team in London wirklich im Ergebnis wahrlich übertroffen. Ich kenne zahlreiche Varianten von Schwanensee, vom Bolschoi in den 80iger , oder auch die berühmte Aufführung von R.Nurejew . Das Orchester wunderbar, ich bin begeistert, wie auch der Dirigent sich den Solisten und dem Chor de Balett einfühlsam widmet. Als herausragende Solistin möchte ich Natalia Osipowa nennen. Sie ist eine Primaballerina einzigartig, für die heutige Zeit unverwechselbar! Grandiose Leistung!! Ich war stellenweise sprachlos, als ich viele bekannte Passagen sehen konnte. Fast wie Live dabei!! Super! Die Qualität der BluRay entspricht exzellent meine Erwartungen, deshalb auch 5 Sterne .
Und am Ende vom Ballett eine neue Schluss Szene, die mir persönlich sehr gefallen hat, sicher wie im Original aber dennoch zeitlos ! Einfach schön anzusehen!
Und am Ende vom Ballett eine neue Schluss Szene, die mir persönlich sehr gefallen hat, sicher wie im Original aber dennoch zeitlos ! Einfach schön anzusehen!

Guy Chamberlain
5つ星のうち5.0
My granddaughter loved
2016年1月20日にカナダでレビュー済みAmazonで購入
It arrived before Christmas and..!My granddaughter loved it

Energeticus
5つ星のうち5.0
An Embarrasment of Riches
2015年10月16日にアメリカ合衆国でレビュー済みAmazonで購入
For the last few years, the Royal Ballet Covent Garden has been putting on a new production of Swan Lake, directed by Anthony Dowell, featuring 19th century Russian costumes and décor. This theme seems to be a tribute to the general time and place of the composition of the ballet by Tchaikovsky. There are two recordings of this on disc, both available in Blu-ray: the first with Marianela Nunez and Thiago Soares; the second and newer with Natalia Osipova and Matthew Golding. The Russian ambience is very sumptuous and rather dark...appropriate to the tragic story. Some reviewers have complained of Siegfried's dark costume, against the dark set. However, I have no problem with this and find that I can see his outlines -- and the compositions Siegfried's body makes with Odette/Odile's -- just fine. The suppression of Siegfried's wonderful solo at the beginning of Act 2 of the classic Makarova/Dowell version is more of a problem for me...but far from a deal breaker, since these two newer versions generally have fewer flaws than all the many other ones I own copies of or have seen either recorded or live.
So now the question is which of the two is the better. I saw the Nunez version first and was quite taken not only with her dancing but also with her acting. She gives meaning to every single one of her moves and gestures. You always know what she's thinking and how she is feeling. This seems to be a triumph of the Anglo-Saxon preference for dramatic vividness as opposed to the Russian tendency to focus far more on the dancing than on acting. Since the former is what I prefer, I found Nunez to be the ultimate Odette/Odile because she combined consummate dancing with seemingly unprecedented attention to meaning and gesture.
...But then I just recently purchased and watched the Osipova version. At first, I couldn't help noticing that she seemed more distant and that her acting was much more muted. However, by the end of the performance, and after going back and watching the Nunez version, I found that I was, quite surprisingly, even more affected by this performance than by the other. Don't get me wrong, I love them both, and having them both in my private library is a must. But there are certain rather subtle factors that make me put Osipova slightly higher. First of all, she is, quite unbelievably, an even greater dancer than Nunez. Yeah, this is rather like comparing Bugattis and Lamborghinis...but I really think now that Osipova wins because of her utter, unmatched mastery of the balletic art. Her DANCING told me what she was thinking and feeling...so I really didn't need her to act so much. What a surprise! Actually, her subtler playing of the role made her end up seeming more vulnerable in the end...and the whole ballet more like a fairy tale. Watching the newer version made me feel more as though I were witnessing the highest imaginable level of art. There were other factors that contributed to this. The music direction in the second version, under Boris Gruzin, was just a bit more sensitive, never rushing anything...except for the fact that Gruzin speeded up Odile's 32 fouettes in the third act because Osipova apparently has no limits! Also, the camerawork in the second version is a bit better, with more poignant close-ups at just the right time. Finally, though both are available on blu-ray, the second version was made in better HD. Ballet is a visual art, so what can I say? The HD image is so crisp that it almost looks like 3D.
So, in conclusion, get both...but if, for some strange reason, you only want one, then go for Osivopa.
So now the question is which of the two is the better. I saw the Nunez version first and was quite taken not only with her dancing but also with her acting. She gives meaning to every single one of her moves and gestures. You always know what she's thinking and how she is feeling. This seems to be a triumph of the Anglo-Saxon preference for dramatic vividness as opposed to the Russian tendency to focus far more on the dancing than on acting. Since the former is what I prefer, I found Nunez to be the ultimate Odette/Odile because she combined consummate dancing with seemingly unprecedented attention to meaning and gesture.
...But then I just recently purchased and watched the Osipova version. At first, I couldn't help noticing that she seemed more distant and that her acting was much more muted. However, by the end of the performance, and after going back and watching the Nunez version, I found that I was, quite surprisingly, even more affected by this performance than by the other. Don't get me wrong, I love them both, and having them both in my private library is a must. But there are certain rather subtle factors that make me put Osipova slightly higher. First of all, she is, quite unbelievably, an even greater dancer than Nunez. Yeah, this is rather like comparing Bugattis and Lamborghinis...but I really think now that Osipova wins because of her utter, unmatched mastery of the balletic art. Her DANCING told me what she was thinking and feeling...so I really didn't need her to act so much. What a surprise! Actually, her subtler playing of the role made her end up seeming more vulnerable in the end...and the whole ballet more like a fairy tale. Watching the newer version made me feel more as though I were witnessing the highest imaginable level of art. There were other factors that contributed to this. The music direction in the second version, under Boris Gruzin, was just a bit more sensitive, never rushing anything...except for the fact that Gruzin speeded up Odile's 32 fouettes in the third act because Osipova apparently has no limits! Also, the camerawork in the second version is a bit better, with more poignant close-ups at just the right time. Finally, though both are available on blu-ray, the second version was made in better HD. Ballet is a visual art, so what can I say? The HD image is so crisp that it almost looks like 3D.
So, in conclusion, get both...but if, for some strange reason, you only want one, then go for Osivopa.

Cliente Amazon
5つ星のうち5.0
Osipova bianca o nera sempre meravigliosa
2015年12月18日にイタリアでレビュー済みAmazonで購入
C'è poco da dire su questa edizione del Lago se non ribadire la bellezza della musica dell'autore e l'invito a riflettere sul labile confine che c'è tra purezza e peccato. L'uno senza l'altro non esisterebbero e la Osipova, la splendida Osipova, nel suo vortice ci attrae, ci aspira, ci fa perdere in lei.